Asus AGP-V6600 SDRAM Driver
Asus AGP-V Deluxe Review - Battle of the Titans Part 2: Who will a non-SDRAM or DDRAM configuration; Asus has taken a diverged. ASUS AGP-V Deluxe SGRAM (part number AGP-V Deluxe) is a desktop Graphics Processing Unit, based on NVIDIA GeForce 32 MB SDR, and. Do not hesitate to visit this page more often to download latest ASUS AGP-V SDRAM V software and drivers for your display hardware. In order to.
|Supported systems:||Windows Vista, Windows Vista 64-bit, Windows XP 64-bit, Mac OS X, Mac OS X 10.4, Mac OS X 10.5|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Registration Required]|
Asus AGP-V6600 SDRAM Driver
Normally we do not care for synthetic benchmarks but this one Asus AGP-V6600 SDRAM based on a real application that should be out in the near future.
Asus AGP-V Deluxe Review -
There are many tests available in 3DMark so I chose a few to start out with and at the resolution of x Originally I had Asus AGP-V6600 SDRAM data for all the resolutions we normally do but it was overkill and we do not want to miss the point of the tests by flooding you with too much information. Please note that the 3dfx VD3 would not Asus AGP-V6600 SDRAM any of the 3DMark tests for whatever reasons.
I am working to get things going for it next review. It could be drivers or it could be the benchmark for all we know.
The Winfast GeForce card is slightly ahead of the other two 'stock' GeForce cards but by less than a reasonable margin of error that comes into play in Asus AGP-V6600 SDRAM tests. Benchmark Results - 3DMark - Fill-Rate single texture We hear all these theoretical numbers about fill-rate but this is what happens when we actually put cards to the real test.
It is interesting to see that most of the Asus AGP-V6600 SDRAM are nearly identical in performance and I can assure you that this is the case even at x resolution in this test. The only thing that confuses my ideas about the benchmark having problems is the fact that the overclocked V smokes the stock V This will have to be investigated further.
Keep in mind that this test is single-texture fill-rate. Switching our little fill-rate test to bit color returned some rather interesting results.
No surprises between the GeForce cards as they all line up at about the same performance. Benchmark Results - 3DMark - Fill-Rate quad texture So we hear all about multi-texturing in this case quad or four textures Asus AGP-V6600 SDRAM pixel from everyone but what happens when we actually use it?
As you can see from the above results, the GeForce cards have no problem dealing with it while the competition chugs along. The GeForce cards Asus AGP-V6600 SDRAM all neck and neck while the overclocked V takes a reasonable lead.
ASUS V Deluxe DDR GeForce
As we throw in Asus AGP-V6600 SDRAM textures the set of GeForce cards stay together but fall much farther behind the higher clocked V and nearly letting the TNT2 Ultra catch them. It is a bit shocking to see the TNT2 Ultra get that close.
This test has an amazingtriangles on the screen with 4 lights Asus AGP-V6600 SDRAM directional and 3 point lights. Every card but the TNT2 Ultra took an even performance hit from the color depth increase. Note that even the overclocked card Asus AGP-V6600 SDRAM barely ahead. Although we have tapped the resolution up a bit, the story stays the same. Notice how the competitors seemed to drop greatly in performance at this point.
Now that the resolution has been pumped up, the cards begin to drop-off in performance. Although very slight, the V card seems to have an edge over its competition. We can also see that the overclocked board is sitting pretty at the top with Asus AGP-V6600 SDRAM frame lead. The only way you will see a difference Asus AGP-V6600 SDRAM performance between the competing GeForce cards will be if the driver revision is that different from the others which is not the case here.
- Asus V Pro 64MB Review -
- AGP-V/ GeForce
- КОНЕЦ СТАТЬИ
At the xx16 resolution, the CPU problem starts to taper off as you can see by the overclocked card pulling ahead but it does not change the fact that the GeForce cards are basically even. Benchmark Results - Descent 3 OpenGL Once again we have the low-resolution situation where Asus AGP-V6600 SDRAM of the cards are in the same performance area and the GeForce boards themselves are basically all tied.
The competing boards are still very much even at this point. Here we have a little surprise as the Leadtek board pushes slightly ahead of its competition. The overclocked Asus V charges ahead as it keeps Asus AGP-V6600 SDRAM strong lead.